Global Equity Markets Under Pressure Amid the US–Israel–Iran Conflict

Navigating the Fog of War: Why This Conflict Matters for Your Portfolio

---

1. Executive Summary

The US-Israel-Iran conflict, which escalated with airstrikes on Iranian targets beginning February 28, 2026, has induced a risk-off environment across global equity markets, exacerbated by energy supply disruptions and elevated inflation expectations. Brent crude has risen 51% over the past month to $103.86 per barrel as of March 13, 2026, contributing to inflationary pressures projected at 1.5-2% globally. Major indices have declined: the S&P 500 is down approximately 3% year-to-date, closing at 6,632.26 on March 13; the Dow Jones Industrial Average is down 3.13% to 46,558.47; and the Nasdaq Composite is down 2.88% to 22,105.36. European and Asian markets have experienced steeper losses of 5-12%, reflecting higher dependence on energy imports.

The primary transmission mechanism is energy markets, which have increased volatility, with the VIX reaching 27.19, and shifted investor sentiment toward extreme fear, as indicated by the CNN Fear & Greed Index at 20 and AAII bearish sentiment at 46.4%. Historical precedents suggest average drawdowns of 4.5%, with recoveries typically occurring within months unless accompanied by recessionary conditions. Key findings include outperformance in defensive sectors such as energy and defense, while airlines and consumer discretionary sectors underperform. In the base case of prolonged conflict, anticipate 5-10% equity drawdowns; rapid de-escalation could yield a 10-15% recovery, whereas major escalation risks 15-25% corrections and a 0.6-1% reduction in global GDP. The IMF maintains a 3.3% growth forecast for 2026, though downside risks from trade disruptions and energy shocks remain elevated.

2. Geopolitics and Financial Markets

Geopolitical conflicts historically generate market uncertainty, leading to risk-off behavior where capital shifts from equities to safe-haven assets such as gold, government bonds, and the US dollar. This dynamic results in elevated volatility, as evidenced by the VIX increase from pre-conflict levels around 15 to over 27, and liquidity constraints from outflows exceeding $20 billion in the initial week. Market responses typically occur in three phases: an initial shock characterized by sharp sell-offs, stabilization through policy interventions such as monetary easing, and medium-term economic adjustment as impacts are absorbed.

Historical comparisons illustrate these patterns:

• The 1973 Oil Crisis, triggered by the Yom Kippur War and OPEC embargo, caused oil prices to quadruple, leading to a 48% decline in the S&P 500 from January 1973 to October 1974 and a prolonged recession.

• The 1990 Gulf War, following Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, induced a 16% drawdown in the S&P 500, followed by a 26-29% recovery by year-end after a swift resolution.

• The September 11, 2001 attacks resulted in a 14% weekly drop in the Dow Jones, with a subsequent V-shaped recovery supported by fiscal and monetary stimulus.

• The 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine caused an initial 7% decline in the S&P 500, but markets recovered 10% within three months as oil prices stabilized.

These events demonstrate median drawdowns of 2.9-4.5%, with full recoveries generally achieved in under a year absent broader economic downturns. The current conflict exhibits similar characteristics, though amplified by modern factors such as algorithmic trading and interconnected supply chains.

3. Immediate Market Reaction

Equity markets have exhibited pronounced declines since the conflict's onset. The S&P 500 has fallen nearly 3% year-to-date to 6,632.26 on March 13, following a 1.52% drop the previous day. The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at 46,558.47, down 3.13% year-to-date, and the Nasdaq Composite at 22,105.36, down 2.88%. Volatility has increased significantly, with the VIX at 27.19. Sector rotation has favored energy, up 2.5%, and defense, while consumer staples and materials have lagged. Capital outflows from equities have totaled over $20 billion, redirecting to bonds and gold.

Regional variations are notable: North American markets have declined less than 2%, supported by domestic energy production. European indices, such as the Stoxx 600, have fallen 1.8-6%, due to reliance on imported natural gas. Asian markets, including the Nikkei and KOSPI, have dropped 6-12%, reflecting vulnerability to oil price increases as major importers.

4. Energy Markets as the Transmission Mechanism

The conflict has disrupted energy supplies through the Strait of Hormuz blockade, elevating Brent crude by 51% monthly to $103.86 per barrel. This has heightened inflation expectations by 1.5-2% globally, increasing transportation and production costs and constraining consumer demand. Historical data indicate that a $10 per barrel increase in oil prices adds 0.4% to inflation and reduces GDP by 0.2%, leading to margin compression and 5-10% downward earnings revisions in affected sectors.

Equity volatility correlates closely with oil price movements, contributing to broader market pressures. While energy producers benefit, the overall impact on indices is negative.

5. Sector Winners and Losers

Certain sectors have benefited from the conflict, while others have suffered. Energy companies, such as ExxonMobil and Chevron, have risen 5-10% due to elevated oil prices. Defense contractors, including Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman, have gained 3-5% amid expectations of increased spending, projected at +10% for US defense budgets. Commodity producers and shipping firms have also seen gains from price increases and route diversions.

Conversely, airlines have declined 5-10% due to fuel cost pressures, with a $22 per barrel rise adding billions to expenses. Tourism and consumer discretionary sectors have weakened from reduced demand, and transportation faces margin erosion.

6. Investor Sentiment and Risk Appetite

Investor sentiment has deteriorated markedly, with AAII bearish readings at 46.4%, the CNN Fear & Greed Index at 20 indicating extreme fear, and the VIX at 27.19. Hedge funds have adopted net short positions in equities, and institutions have reallocated toward defensive assets. Risk premiums have increased by 50 basis points, compressing price-to-earnings ratios to 18x and constraining liquidity.

7. Macroeconomic Transmission

The conflict transmits through energy inflation, potentially reducing global GDP by 0.6-1%, though the IMF maintains a 3.3% forecast for 2026 with noted downside risks. Interest rate expectations have shifted, delaying cuts to October amid volatility that has strengthened the DXY by +2%. Trade disruptions could further deduct 0.5% from growth, with currency fluctuations amplifying effects. Central banks, including the Federal Reserve, may pause easing, while the IMF and World Bank highlight tariffs as potential aggravators.

8. Historical Case Studies

The 1973 Oil Crisis

The Yom Kippur War and OPEC embargo quadrupled oil prices from $3 to $12 per barrel, resulting in 12% inflation and economic contraction. The S&P 500 declined 48% over 21 months from January 1973 to October 1974. Even energy sectors fell 35-44%, with industrials and consumer goods suffering from cost pressures. Recovery required six years, underscoring the impact of prolonged energy shocks.

The 1990 Gulf War

Iraq's invasion of Kuwait doubled oil to $46 per barrel, causing a 16% S&P 500 drawdown. Sectors experienced mixed performance, with energy gaining initially but broader uncertainty prevailing. The coalition's victory led to a 26-29% recovery by year-end, with a mild recession contained by swift resolution.

September 11, 2001 Attacks

The attacks closed markets for four days, with the Dow falling 7.1% upon reopening and $1.4 trillion in value lost weekly. Airlines and insurance sectors were hardest hit, with claims totaling $33 billion. Defense rallied on spending increases. Stimulus enabled a V-shaped recovery, though full normalization took months.

The 2022 Russia-Ukraine Invasion

Oil rose 35%, leading to a 7% initial S&P 500 decline and higher losses in Europe (10-15%). Energy and defense sectors gained 15-20%, while tech and consumer lagged 10%. Markets recovered 10% within three months as supplies diversified and policies adapted.

These cases highlight drawdowns of 2.9-4.5% on median, with sector shifts to defense and energy, and recoveries dependent on resolution speed.

9. Forward-Looking Market Scenarios

Scenario 1 – Rapid De-Escalation: Diplomatic resolution reduces oil below $100, improving sentiment and enabling a 10-15% equity recovery, with the S&P 500 potentially reaching 7,000+.

Scenario 2 – Prolonged Regional Conflict: Oil at $100-150 sustains volatility, favoring defensives and resulting in 5-10% drawdowns.

Scenario 3 – Major Regional Escalation: Oil exceeding $150 induces a severe risk-off environment, with 15-25% corrections and 40% recession probability.

10. Investment Implications

Portfolio positioning should emphasize defensive sectors such as energy and utilities, with allocations of 5-10%. Diversification into commodities and gold provides hedging. Risk management includes VIX calls and stop-loss orders at 5-10% thresholds. Long-term, selective purchases of quality equities during dips are advisable, given historical patterns.

11. Conclusion

Geopolitical conflicts induce short-term equity volatility, as observed in the current US-Israel-Iran situation, driven by energy disruptions and sentiment shifts. Historical analysis indicates resilience, with moderate drawdowns and recoveries contingent on conflict duration, energy market stability, and economic conditions. In the base case, anticipate moderate declines followed by a Q2 2026 recovery.

---

Disclaimer

The information contained in this research report ("Report") is provided by Hawkmont Research, a global macro research firm, for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute investment, financial, legal, tax, or accounting advice. This Report does not represent an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, financial instruments, or investments, nor does it form the basis of any contract or commitment.

All opinions, estimates, projections, and analyses expressed in this Report are those of the authors as of the date of publication and are subject to change without notice. They are based on sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of the information. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and actual outcomes may differ materially from those forecasted due to various risks, including but not limited to geopolitical developments, economic conditions, market volatility, regulatory changes, and unforeseen events.

Forward-looking statements in this Report, including price scenarios, economic forecasts, and investment implications, involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to vary significantly. Readers should not place undue reliance on such statements. Hawkmont Research assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the Report or for any decisions made based on its content.

This Report may discuss specific securities, sectors, or markets, but such discussions are not recommendations to buy, sell, or hold. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with qualified professionals before making investment decisions. The Report is not tailored to any individual's financial situation, objectives, or risk tolerance.

Data and charts are derived from publicly available sources and may include estimates or projections. Citations and references are provided where applicable, but Hawkmont Research does not guarantee their ongoing availability or accuracy.

Distribution of this Report is subject to applicable laws and regulations. It is not directed to any jurisdiction where its distribution would be prohibited. By accessing or using this Report, you agree to these terms.